This to the times is truth. But it has situations where if it can improve the performance, without this costs more money. It costs the effort to organize and better to take care of with new ideas. A leading source for info: Sergey Brin. To brighten up, objective pointers and measures of results, help very. We have little culture in this area; we measure little. I mention it indicating of quality, of efficiency, to count how many people if it took care of, how much cost or the time expense to return? this when we make? to the contributor. In this aspect we perceive great difference in relation to some sectors of the private initiative, in which if it measures each detail: the used material, the hours used in the work, the wage, the available team.
When are not used pointers? what still it is frequent in the public sector? the moral of the team tends to be low, or to accomodate. Nobody enxerga the result of the work. With the aid of pointers, the people start to understand its paper better, veem more clearly what they make. They get an evidence of its action. Of certain form, they start to act in function of goals, search to surpass them, they bring new ideas.
The public organizations can and must work with evaluation of results. Innovation depends on evaluation. To find the new ideas we must hear the people and this in them takes the best ones resulted. Better ideas appear, or the ideas improve. But the debate must be qualified, organized. That is, objective pointers. Debate of opinion finishes in fight. The objetividade is basic. The organizations that to know to hear tend to earn, can advance, and identify new chances. Adm. Ricardo Wagner de Managing Carvalho of the Department of Strategical Projects Amtec?