A frequent situation over which many agencies of professional cathedral encounter is the coexistence of several names of dominion of the same owner or group industralist. This is that when trying to work in the positioning a page, the company owns other similar dominions with the same content. The reason for which some people in charge of dominion tend to gather together similar dominions responds to an attempt to diminish or to neutralize the possible competition, or to safeguard the integrity of the mark against little ethical attempts of the bad competitors. That is that in prevention of which other competing companies can become of easily posicionables dominions or that they can buy very similar dominions and fill them of information that could damage our client, is chosen to buy or to reserve that name of dominion. The intention is reasonable, but not always it causes for the cathedral and positioning of the dominion that we tried to promote.
The main obstacle it is the duplicated content. On the other hand Google tends to penalize any type of action that can be interpreted like a manipulation of the natural positioning. Thus if it detects that several exist " websites espejo" a sanction can be triggered. This becomes more evident when the mailing dress that it appears in the forms of contact of these sites is the same, and does not require of concerted effort to realize, then, of which websites is of the same person or the same person in charge, and they are not competing, being at some moments causes sufficient for so feared penalty. I want to make clear, that I talk about precise to the creation of a site residing in each dominion, with its own space of hosting. I am not speaking than we know like Parking. That is, dominions that direct to the same site with the unique content of the main dominion.