Exactly for this vision, that for as much time was judged as standard (and still today managers exist that they think of this form), he had the call rivalry between masters and employees, a time that did not have in the organization the perspective of mutual growth of both the parts, as today shows the politics of ' ' he earns-ganha' ' , that already he offers to a new vision on the contribution and the growth of both inside of the organization (CHIAVENATO, 2009). Here, John Utendahl expresses very clear opinions on the subject. 2.1? The Administrator and Administrator yesterday of today Making a paradox enter the papers exerted for the managers of diverse times lived for the Brazilian society can affirm with certainty that much thing moved since that ' ' figura' ' of the Administrator he started to be recognized and inserted in the enterprise scene. To manage, according to Aurlio dictionary, means ' ' to govern, to manage, to direct, to make justia' ' (…). Old, this everything could only be made by a manager, that it inside had domain on any situation of the company where acted. It had the idea of that ' ' word final' ' it would be of it, without an other people’s opinion for decisions, a previous study of other possibilities, at last: alone manager was capable to lead ' ' relatively bem' ' an organization. With the happened ones of a more modern time, where if it speaks in Globalization, Ecoeficincia and Social Responsabilidade, if it very became a difficult task for only one person to give to account of all on subjects to the organizacional life. Looking at today for a company it is obtained to enxergar it for its specific areas first, as RH, Marketing, Finances, Production, amongst others; it is basically the call sistmica vision, where we visualize the parts, and from them we understand all. . .