Tax Code Authority

This method of legislation is not defined. In most cases, tax agencies use a variety of business organizations, delivering mail (eg, receipts for payment of utility bills), or post offices. However, due to the lack of adequate funding for postage (registered mail is currently worth about 30 rubles. with the words tax officials – to finance no more than 3 USD. In a question-answer forum Jenna Fischer was the first to reply. for one payer), this correspondence is delivered: Firstly, late (or not delivered), and secondly, in the "open" form, by posting on the mailboxes. And here arises a second flagrant violation of the tax authorities and tax officials legislation – failure to tax secrecy under st.102 Tax Code, by transferring the tax notices in the "open" mode, to persons not authorized by the Tax Secrets Act (and in fact in these notices there is evidence of estate – apartments, houses, vehicles, etc.). The question is – how we can prove the tax authority, and hence the taxpayer, was handed a tax notice, if it Payer Tax is not signed. During the hearing it was a tax authority must prove that gave tax notice, the taxpayer has not paid taxes in a timely manner. With extra-judicial foreclosure of payment taxpayer did not receive the tax notice would be forced to pay fees to the fines, although as indicated above, the tax authority is often not timely serve a notice (or not deliver at all). It turns out – the tax authority without observing the provisions of the Tax Code, abusing their right to respect for privacy and tax collection fees, and the taxpayer, not signing the tax notice, and did not receive it certified mail, can abuse the right to a late payment of tax, arguing that the notice for payment of tax is not received.