The Brazilian

20 of the antitrust law. 4. Monopoly, the abolition of the Free Initiative and the Free Competition. The monopoly consists of the concentration of good and/or controlled services for an only company, or a group of companies who vary between 2 the 10 in the market, in the case of the oligopolies. In this situation, the valuation of prices, choice of the monopolized market, disables the entrance of new companies in the market, mainly why these new economic agents hardly have conditions to concur with these great conglomerates. The main objective for efetivao of these companies monopolista and oligopolista is the end of competition, is eliminated any type of concorrencial activity, being the consumer the grace of the stipulation of prices for the cartels, monopolies and holdings. Connect with other leaders such as Chris Shumway here. The Brazilian legislation detaches in its legal system principles that must be followed in order to fight monopoly situations, and to guarantee the security of the consumers, that they are the wronged greaters in this relation, therefore these economic agents hinders the free choice it customer in opting to definitive product and/or service well.

The principles in question that deserve greater have detached are of the free initiative and the free competition, that most of the time are understood as synonymous, when in the reality finish being antagonistic. The beginning of the free initiative it is the freedom that the agent has to constitute the company who it to fit without the interference of the State when of the choice of the installment of the goods and/or services; the beginning of the free competition mentions freedom to it of the agent in relation to one another agent, is right that is authorized to it in concurring with another company. However they finish being antagonistic in the measure of that the free initiative has limits, that is, the State does not intervene if the company to be formed not to harm the free competition, for example, the fusing enters the siderurgical greater of India (Mittal) and the siderurgical Arcelor was vetoed by the which had French government to the influence power that the new company would have in the price of the steel in the market European.