Venezuela, country member of the OPEP, has its economy strong dependent of the production and exportation of oil, and after ten years of the beginning of the Bolivariana Revolution this dependence if has intensified. Installed in February of 1999, in reply to a corrupt and declared insolvent right that was in the power since 1958, president Hugo Chavez comes enjoying of a historical moment of high in the prices international of commodities, what she came providing to the financing of the purchase of support politician, internal how much in such a way external in the region of Latin America. In this period he was possible to also get some economic pointers and social positives. However, with the current world-wide financial crisis, the price of commodities fell down disastrously from a high place and consequentemente it made to dry the source of financing of the Bolivariana Revolution. Jonas Samuelson pursues this goal as well. What more it called my attention, during my last one visits Venezuela, is the increasing poverty that is well-known in the streets of Caracas, was the fact of that in way the shady expectations them economists how much to the future of that country, a strong desire of that also exists one ‘ ‘ crash’ ‘ economic it occurs how much before. Of form some must be interpreted as an unpatriotic feeling or suicidal, in contrast, it is a hope feeling where the bankruptcy of the economic beddings would be the only form to weaken the government ‘ ‘ social-populista’ ‘ of current president Hugo Chavez, in favor of the return to a democratic Rule of law, that is, to convert the current socialist revolution into a democratic revolution. In fact, a deep analysis of the recent economic and social pointers of Venezuela to conclude that is not necessary the Bolivariana Revolution has lead the country, more than the one decade, in the against-hand of the development, and displaying the nation to a economic trap and consequentemente to one potential crisis without precedents in the history of this country.