3.3Motivao: Which the perception of the executives of the company in relation to the motivation of its employees, in accordance with the theory of Douglas McGregor? The comment of the administrative techniques and management of RH of the company takes in them to believe that its executives observe the employees mainly (although not total) under the boarded aspects for theory Y, that says: 1.Os individuals can find the work something so natural how much to rest and to have fun themselves. 2.As people will demonstrate auto-orientation and self-control, will have been committed to the objectives. 3.Em the average, the people can learn to accept, or until searching, the responsibility. to 4.Qualquer person can have the capacity to take decisions innovative. One is not about exclusive privilege of those in higher hierarchic positions. (ROBINS, 2009) We conclude this considering the little control on the point register, the flexibility of schedules, the total inexistence of tools of measurement of performance. Being the evaluated organization, of public character, as is decided the question of equity in the company in relation to the comparison of wages with other individuals with similar jobs in the same organization? The company offers to plan of positions and wages based on factors as time of service and formation, that the merit does not benefit, making possible that employee with the same position and same responsibilities they receive wages different.
With this, it creates an environment that does not please the people who search motivation in the capacity as instrumental value and the recognition as terminal value. Obviously, these characteristics do not favor motivation of the employees, therefore at no moment the good performance, the creativity or the proactivity offer reward concrete. Already the level of insatisfao of the employees is very low, therefore the hygienical factors as surrounding of work, relation with the colleagues, security of the job, benefits etc.